Part 2: The Retirement Paycheck Problem: Turning Investments Into Income
Imagine reaching retirement with $1.5 million accumulated across a 401(k), IRA and brokerage account.
You have done what retirement advice told you to do.
You saved.
You invested.
You accumulated.
Now comes the question that often receives far less attention:
How much can you actually spend?
And right behind it:
Which account should the money come from?
How much tax will the withdrawal create?
What happens if markets fall?
How much should remain invested?
How long does the money need to last?
This is what I call the retirement paycheck problem.
A retirement account can accumulate assets remarkably well.
It does not automatically produce a retirement income strategy.
Previous Generations Often Had a Paycheck Built In
Traditional pension plans solved an important retirement problem.
A worker retired and generally knew that a predetermined benefit would arrive regularly.
The retiree didn't necessarily have to decide how much stock to sell in November or which retirement account should finance the January mortgage payment.
Gen X faces a different environment.
The WSJ Intelligence and Equitable research notes that defined-contribution plans replaced much of the predictability once provided by pensions. Those plans may provide considerable flexibility and investment opportunity, but they also place greater responsibility on retirees to determine how accumulated assets will become sustainable income.
In other words:
Gen X may have to build its own retirement paycheck.
A Portfolio and a Paycheck Have Different Jobs
A traditional investment portfolio is generally designed around growth, risk tolerance and diversification.
Retirement income introduces another variable:
cash flow.
A retirement portfolio may need to accomplish several objectives simultaneously:
Generate money for current expenses.
Maintain sufficient liquidity.
Participate in long-term growth.
Protect against inflation.
Manage taxes.
Survive market downturns.
Last throughout retirement.
These goals occasionally conflict.
Money needed next year shouldn't necessarily be invested exactly like money intended for use 20 years from now.
That is why retirement planning benefits from assigning different assets different jobs.
Think in Terms of Purpose
One useful framework is to organize retirement assets around four broad purposes.
1. Lifestyle
These are the resources supporting your ongoing life:
housing
food
utilities
travel
transportation
recreation
and everyday expenses.
The objective is reliability.
You need to know where the money will come from.
2. Protection
These resources help protect the retirement plan when things don't go according to plan.
That may include liquidity for emergencies, healthcare expenses or periods when selling growth investments could be undesirable.
3. Growth
A retirement portfolio still needs growth.
Someone retiring at 65 could easily have a planning horizon extending into their 90s.
That means part of the portfolio may need to continue producing long-term appreciation to offset inflation and future spending needs.
4. Legacy
Some assets may ultimately be intended for children, grandchildren, charities or other beneficiaries.
Those assets may have a different time horizon than money needed to pay today's bills.
The study itself describes planning across similar time horizons: meeting immediate needs, protecting resources over the intermediate term and maximizing legacy over a longer period.
The important concept is not the label assigned to each category.
It is understanding that not every retirement dollar has the same job.
Withdrawal Order Matters
Consider an investor with:
a traditional IRA
a Roth IRA
a taxable brokerage account
cash reserves
and Social Security
There are numerous ways those resources could be used.
But they do not all have the same tax treatment.
Taking additional money from a traditional IRA may increase taxable income.
Selling securities in a taxable account could generate capital gains.
Roth withdrawals may receive different tax treatment.
Higher income can also interact with other retirement costs.
The point is not that there is one withdrawal sequence appropriate for everyone.
There isn't.
The point is that withdrawal strategy should be intentional.
Simply taking money from whichever account is easiest may be convenient, but convenience is not a retirement strategy.
Market Timing Becomes More Important When You Are Withdrawing
Market volatility feels different when you're still contributing to retirement accounts.
A decline may actually allow new contributions to purchase investments at lower prices.
Retirement changes the equation.
If a retiree must continuously sell investments during a significant downturn to support living expenses, the portfolio may lose assets that otherwise could have participated in a future recovery.
That is one reason retirement portfolios should be designed around more than expected returns.
They also need a distribution strategy.
The study emphasizes that risks such as outliving one's money or being forced to sell assets at an unfavorable time need to be considered alongside traditional investment risk.
Predictability Has Value
Some retirement income may come from Social Security.
Some individuals may also have pensions.
Other income may come from investment portfolios, real estate or other resources.
Certain households may also evaluate guaranteed-income strategies as part of the overall plan.
The appropriate combination depends on the individual.
The research found considerable interest among surveyed Gen X investors in more predictable income strategies. Eighty-one percent reported awareness of the potential benefits of guaranteed-income approaches, and 74% said they would consider implementing such strategies if recommended by an advisor.
That does not mean every retiree needs the same product or solution.
It means predictable income has genuine planning value.
Retirement Income Is a System
The most effective retirement income strategy is rarely one account, one investment or one product.
Instead, it usually involves coordinating:
Social Security + portfolio withdrawals + cash reserves + tax strategy + investment strategy + risk management.
And then adjusting that system as circumstances change.
Because retirement itself changes.
Spending may be higher during the early years.
Healthcare expenses may increase later.
A spouse may die.
Markets will fluctuate.
Tax laws may change.
Family needs may change.
A retirement income strategy should therefore be both disciplined and adaptable.
The CPA Allies Perspective
Accumulating wealth is one financial challenge.
Converting accumulated wealth into reliable, sustainable and tax-conscious income is another.
That is why retirement planning shouldn't begin with:
"Which investment should I buy?"
It should begin with:
"What does my money need to accomplish?"
Once that question is answered, investment decisions become part of the strategy rather than the strategy itself.
Source: Based in part on Approaching Retirement: Getting Gen X from Good to Great, WSJ Intelligence & Equitable Thought Leadership Study, August 2025.
Comments